Commitment Ledger: Local Candidate Promise Registry & Scorecard Service
A hyperlocal, human-powered service that captures candidate commitments during campaigns via standardized intake forms (submitted by campaigns, volunteers, or journalists), publishes them in a simple, comparable format online, and tracks fulfillment post-election by monitoring council votes, budget allocations, and public records. Each city/county gets a dedicated Commitment Ledger page with side-by-side candidate cards showing promises, priority areas, and accountability scores updated quarterly.
36 weeks • 70% confidence
Value Proposition
Beats fragmented candidate websites and news coverage because it is standardized, comparable, and persistent post-election. Beats generic voter guides because it tracks *actual* follow-through, not just promises. Creates a reusable artifact that compounds in value each election cycle as historical data builds.
Target Audience
Local news organizations, civic groups, and election commissions in mid-sized cities (50k–500k population) where voter confusion is highest and institutional capacity is lowest
Key Features
- Standardized intake form (5–7 policy areas: budget priorities, zoning, schools, public safety, etc.) that campaigns fill out or volunteers transcribe
- Public-facing candidate comparison cards showing commitments side-by-side with plain-language summaries
- Post-election accountability tracker: quarterly updates on whether promises were acted on (vote records, budget items, ordinances passed)
- And more, with full implementation detail...
Tech Stack
Unlock the full solution
You're seeing a preview. Unlock the complete value proposition, every feature, the full tech stack, the monetization model, and the week-by-week build roadmap, plus a downloadable PDF.
Sign up free to continue3 free solution credits on signup
The build plan is behind the wall
Subscribers get the full monetization model, pricing strategy, and the complete week-by-week roadmap to build this.
Sign up freeOriginal Problem
Voters struggle to understand candidate positions and track political accountability between electionsVoters lack accessible, centralized information about what candidates actually prioritize and commit to during campaigns, making it difficult to hold elected officials accountable for promises made. Current solutions rely on scattered news coverage, candidate websites, and social media, which are fragmented, biased, or incomplete. This creates voter confusion and low engagement in local elections where information gaps are most severe.
Score: 46.5%