Voter Accountability Scorecard (Physical Voter Guide)
A 4-page laminated pocket voter guide (3x5 inches) produced for specific local elections that lists all candidates for contested races with a standardized 5-metric scorecard: voting record alignment with district preferences (based on polling), legislative effectiveness (bills passed/failed), attendance record, financial disclosure red flags, and constituent complaint ratio from state ethics boards. Printed in bulk and distributed via libraries, community centers, and polling places.
22 weeks • 70% confidence
Value Proposition
Voters get a fact-based comparison tool they can hold in their pocket at the polling place. No app required, no digital divide. Scorecards are non-partisan (metrics are objective) so election commissions can distribute without bias accusations. Cheaper than mailers, more durable than flyers.
Target Audience
Local election commissions, county clerks, League of Women Voters chapters, and community organizations in mid-sized counties (50k-300k population) with contested state/local races
Key Features
- Standardized 5-metric scorecard for every candidate (voting record, effectiveness, attendance, ethics flags, constituent complaints)
- Color-coded ratings (green/yellow/red) for quick visual scanning
- QR code linking to full voting record and sources
- And more, with full implementation detail...
Tech Stack
Unlock the full solution
You're seeing a preview. Unlock the complete value proposition, every feature, the full tech stack, the monetization model, and the week-by-week build roadmap, plus a downloadable PDF.
Sign up free to continue3 free solution credits on signup
The build plan is behind the wall
Subscribers get the full monetization model, pricing strategy, and the complete week-by-week roadmap to build this.
Sign up freeOriginal Problem
Voters struggle to evaluate political candidates' actual track records and judicial decisionsVoters face difficulty accessing and understanding specific judicial actions and policy decisions by political candidates, relying instead on campaign rhetoric and partisan narratives. Current news sources provide fragmented coverage, making it hard to build a comprehensive view of a candidate's actual performance in office. This information gap leads to uninformed voting decisions and post-election regret.
Score: 18.2%