Conference organizers overwhelmed by manual review and organization of thousands of paper submissions

Conference chairs and program committees struggle to efficiently manage, organize, and review massive volumes of academic submissions, leading to bottlenecks in the peer review process, delayed decisions, and administrative burnout. Current solutions like basic email systems and spreadsheets don't scale, forcing organizers to spend weeks on logistics instead of focusing on quality curation. This directly impacts conference timelines and the ability to deliver decisions to authors on schedule.