Researchers cannot reliably determine conference credibility and legitimacy before submitting work

Academics and researchers waste time and risk their reputation by submitting to conferences with unclear or questionable peer review standards, yet lack a clear way to verify what 'peer reviewed' actually means for a specific conference. Current solutions like conference websites and word-of-mouth are unreliable, and researchers often discover too late that a conference lacks rigorous review processes, resulting in wasted submission effort, delayed publication timelines, and potential career damage from publishing in low-credibility venues.