AgentMatch: Curated Agent Directory with Submission Tracking
A proprietary database of 500+ vetted literary agents (US/UK focus initially) with real-time submission status tracking, response rates, and genre-specific acceptance criteria. Authors input their manuscript details once; the platform matches them to agents actively accepting their genre, shows which agents have responded to them, and flags known predatory operators. Built on verified data from agent websites, acknowledgment pages, and direct agent outreach.
33 weeks • 70% confidence
Value Proposition
Eliminates 70% of wasted submissions by pre-filtering agents by actual acceptance criteria and response history. Saves $200-500 per author by preventing accidental submissions to fee-charging scams. Response tracking prevents duplicate submissions and tracks agent engagement over time—authors know if an agent ghosted or is genuinely slow.
Target Audience
Unpublished fiction and narrative nonfiction authors (ages 25-65) actively querying agents; primarily self-directed writers who distrust traditional routes but won't pay upfront fees.
Key Features
- Agent database with verified submission guidelines, response times, and recent deals
- Submission tracker that logs query sends, response dates, and agent feedback
- Genre-to-agent matching algorithm (not just keyword search)
- And more, with full implementation detail...
Tech Stack
Unlock the full solution
You're seeing a preview. Unlock the complete value proposition, every feature, the full tech stack, the monetization model, and the week-by-week build roadmap, plus a downloadable PDF.
Sign up free to continue3 free solution credits on signup
The build plan is behind the wall
Subscribers get the full monetization model, pricing strategy, and the complete week-by-week roadmap to build this.
Sign up freeOriginal Problem
Aspiring authors struggle to navigate agent submission process without paying predatory feesUnpublished writers desperately need to find legitimate literary agents who don't charge upfront fees, but lack reliable ways to distinguish reputable agents from scams. Current solutions (agent databases, websites) are fragmented and don't clearly surface which agents accept unsolicited submissions for free, forcing authors to waste time on dead ends or risk losing money to vanity presses and fee-charging 'agents.'
Score: 17.5%